Comments on: Which came first?

By: Will W

Will W — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:42:43 +0000

Some of these guys are actually negative and seeking to get “poz-ed”, while others are just turned on by the aspect of cum inside of them. Whatever the case I don’t agree with the glorification of this lifestyle, but to each his own. To clarify: not all of these men are HIV positive, but may end up that way either intentionally or not.

By: arnon

arnon — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:04:56 +0000

this kind of sex is between people. If you are a normal person you don’t bareback knowing that tou are hiv positiv. Sex is also something of trust so by self always the wise guy.

By: SteveA

SteveA — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:02:00 +0000

I’ve been reading alot of those websites as well and I think it’s psychological. On one blog site a guy was asking his readers and polling about if they were abused as children.
I also think that some of these guys feel “liberated” when they have HIV – then by barebacking they have nothing to fear.

By: Corve

Corve — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:11:10 +0000

I have come across a few and I wonder why they do it. I come to the conclusion that they do not care about life.

By: Michael Anthony

Michael Anthony — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:52:15 +0000

I will always come down against barebacking. I have worked for years in HIV wards, and for anyone who thinks this is a joyride, think again.
Would it be ok if suddenly restaurant workers stopped washing their hands and Hepatitis A broke out? Would it be ok if people with TB stopped taking their meds and coughed their way thru subways?
This has nothing to do with personal freedom either. You have the freedom, if you so choose, to speed down the motorway without a seatbelt on. If you crash and are killed, that is your own fault. But if you claim others lives, than its homocide. Its no different when one knowingly plays with others lives.