Comments on: Distracted by art

By: Larry

Larry — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:06:01 +0000

This ‘straight’ boy is one of the most beautiful men that I have ever seen cock and all!

By: Sue

Sue — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:00:15 +0000

Uh huh. I found this young man’s dick quite distracting. Might have had something to do with it’s size. (Ya think???)

Whereas in Classical statues, the male anatomy is typically far less generous in proportion and thus less distracting. I’m just sayin’.

By: Doug

Doug — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:45:37 +0000

I agree with Crik. I’m one gay man who just really doesn’t care all that much about the particulars of someone’s penis.

Call me crazy but a dick just ain’t all that distracting for me.

By: Marc

Marc — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:32:39 +0000

More like straight up my ass. I love the lighting in these photos. I like the Chinese “treasure trail” tattoo. It’s interesting how his cock is “restrained” in some of those photos. Like it’s a beast at rest.

By: Koshchei

Koshchei — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:16:41 +0000

If I remember correctly a marble figleaf was placed on M.”s David for a while to avoid offense. Sheesh!
J.Gregory has the symbol for Libra tattooed on his pec.

By: Crik

Crik — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:54:08 +0000

I very much agree with kirill. I find that hiding the cock in many cases just creates annoyance about the fact that its hidden. Having it visible satisfies the urge to see it (which I’ll admit is a paticularly strong urge in my case), and that lack of frustration usually makes it easier to take in the rest of the picture.

As for the line about judging the model mercilessly on the size of his appendage – don’t assume that you’re speaking for everyone when you say that “our eyes” do that.

By: kirill

kirill — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:13:33 +0000

hm, i can’t agree with you on that – do you think Michelangelo’s David would look better with hidden pisello hidden? And practically all ancient greek statues of athletes and myth heroes depict modestly endowed men, and yet they’ve a canon in nude male art and inspiration for homoeroticism for centuries. Mystery can add something to the photo, but why should it be necessarily a mystery about the dick? By hiding it you only draw attention to it, making you wonder if it looks as good as the rest. But isn’t there anything else to think of? If the dick looks harmoniously with the rest of the body, I think the artwork shouldn’t hide it. I think it makes more sense to make the intrigue from the behavior/pose/circumstances of the photo and not just hiding the dick